Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead. Trade-offs between ecosystem services: Water and carbon in a biodiversity hotspot. Response and multiscenario simulation of trade-offs/synergies among ecosystem services to the Grain to Green Program: A case study of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration, China. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 73(2): 1–8.Ĭhen T T, Peng L, Wang Q, 2022. Spatial assessment of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in Zimbabwe. Land Degradation & Development, 29(1): 162–175.Ĭhawanji S, Masocha M, Dube T, 2018. When and where did the Loess Plateau turn “green”? Analysis of the tendency and breakpoints of the normalized difference vegetation index. Journal of Environmental Management, 183: 843–849.Ĭao Z, Li Y R, Liu Y S et al., 2018. Ecosystem water imbalances created during ecological restoration by afforestation in China, and lessons for other developing countries. (in Chinese)Ĭao S X, Zhang J Z, Chen L et al., 2016. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 14(2): 19–24. Study of applying USLE and geographical information system IDRISI to predict soil erosion in small watershed. New York: Academic Press.Ĭai C F, Ding S W, Shi Z H, et al., 2000. Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management. (in Chinese)īradford J B, D’Amato A W, 2012. Runoff characteristics in flood and dry seasons in source regions of Changjiang River and Huanghe River based on wavelet analysis. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. The Science of the Total Environment, 716: 137083.īennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J, 2010. Scale effects on the relationships between land characteristics and eco-system services: A case study in Taihu Lake Basin, China. This study could provide insights into trade-offs and synergies among ESs and their driving forces and lay a foundation for ecological restoration and sustainable development of ESs in the YRB.īai Y, Chen Y, Alatalo J M et al., 2020. The heterogeneity of the landscape could also effectively promote synergies among ESs. Specifically, the trade-offs among ESs in the UYRB were primarily affected by precipitation, and those in the MYRB and LYRB by human disturbance. In the YRB, the relationships among ESs were mainly influenced by human disturbance, precipitation, and land-use and exploitation intensity. At the spatial scale, the relationships between HQ and WY, HQ and SC, HQ and NPP, FP and SC, and FP and HQ were all dominated by trade-offs, while other ES pairs were mostly based on synergistic relationships. The relationship between ESs in the YRB was dominated by weak trade-offs and weak synergies at a temporal scale, with the trade-offs strengthened in the Upper Yellow River Basin (UYRB) and the Middle Yellow River Basin (MYRB), and synergies strengthened in the Lower Yellow River Basin (LYRB). The results demonstrated that the average HQ per unit area decreased by 18.10%, while SC, NPP, WY, and FP increased by 42.68%, 47.63%, 30.82%, and 67.10%, respectively, from 2000 to 2020. Redundancy analysis was used to identify the impact of natural, socioeconomic, and landscape patterns on the relationship between ESs. This study simulated food production (FP), water yield (WY), net primary production (NPP), soil conservation (SC), and habitat quality (HQ) in the YRB from 2000 to 2020, and evaluated the spatial evolution and the relationship of ESs at the raster scale. Understanding the spatiotemporal characteristics of the relationships among multiple ecosystem services (ESs) and their drivers is crucial for regional sustainable development and human-earth system coordination. The Yellow River Basin (YRB) occupies an important position in China’s socioeconomic development and ecological conservation efforts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |